cd163 fitc (Bioss)
Structured Review

Cd163 Fitc, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd163 fitc/product/Bioss
Average 91 stars, based on 8 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) Coadministered with a β-Blocker Prevent Liver Fibrosis Caused by Ethanol and Methamphetamine in Rats by Downregulating the Expression of M2 Macrophages"
Article Title: Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) Coadministered with a β-Blocker Prevent Liver Fibrosis Caused by Ethanol and Methamphetamine in Rats by Downregulating the Expression of M2 Macrophages
Journal: ACS Omega
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c10118
Figure Legend Snippet: M1 and M2 macrophage characterization by qPCR (a) and Flow Cytometry (b). The M1 phenotype is characterized by CD68 and CD80 gene expressions, while CD163, ARG1, and CD206 gene expressions are present in the M2 macrophage phenotype. All results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from two independent experiments, each performed with a minimum of three replicates. Statistically significant differences are indicated by multiplicity-adjusted p -values: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001; (ns) denotes no significant difference. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Dunnett’s correction.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Standard Deviation
Figure Legend Snippet: Liver expression of AKT (a–c), TGFb (d–f), CD163 (g–i), CD86 (j–l), NFkB (m–o), IL-10 (p–r), and Pi3K (s–u) in Wistar rats submitted to alcoholic liver injury.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Liver expression of AKT (a), TGFb (b), CD163 (c), CD86 (d), NFkB (e), IL-10 (f), and Pi3K (g). All data are presented as mean ± SD. Fluorescence intensity data was generated by Zeiss Zen Lite software for each picture taken (10 images per subject, 5 animals per group, 400× magnification). Statistically significant differences are indicated as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001; (ns) denotes no significant difference. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc correction for multiple comparisons.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Fluorescence, Generated, Software
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison between M1 (CD86) and M2 (CD163) immunofluorescence labeling in Wistar rats submitted to alcoholic liver injury. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Fluorescence intensity measurements were obtained using Zeiss Zen Lite software, with 10 images captured per subject, 5 animals per group, at 400× magnification. Statistically significant differences are denoted as * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.005; (ns) indicates no significant difference. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc correction.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Immunofluorescence, Labeling, Fluorescence, Software
